Review



normal human gastric mucosal epithelial ges 1 cells  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 97

    Structured Review

    ATCC normal human gastric mucosal epithelial ges 1 cells
    Normal Human Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Ges 1 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1432 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cells/Primary+Small+Airway+Epithelial+Cells%3B+Normal%2C+Human/bio_rxiv__2025__08__24__672019-33-0-20
    Average 97 stars, based on 1432 article reviews
    normal human gastric mucosal epithelial ges 1 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    97/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Cell Culture:

    Article Title: Capsaicin acts as a novel NRF2 agonist to suppress ethanol induced gastric mucosa oxidative damage by directly disrupting the KEAP1-NRF2 interaction
    Article Snippet: IRDye® 800CW was bought from LI-COR . .. Human gastric mucosal epithelial cells (GES-1), HEK293T human embryonic kidney 293 cells (293T) and Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSC) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured at 37°C in 5% CO 2 . .. KEAP1 Knockout 293T Cell Lysate (293T-KO) was purchased from ABclonal (RM02350).

    Article Title: Knockdown of TIM1 enhances platinum chemosensitivity and inhibits progression through the MAPK signaling pathway in gastric cancer
    Article Snippet: .. Human gastric mucosal epithelial cells (GES-1), human gastric cancer cell lines (BGC-823, SGC-7901, MGC-803, MKN-45, SNU-16), HGC-27 (human gastric cancer cells, undifferentiated), and human renal epithelial lines (HEK-293T) were originally acquired from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, USA) and cultured as per instructions. .. The shNC and shTIM1 primers (sh1 and sh2) were designed by Shanghai Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China), and shNC and TIM1 knockdown plasmids were constructed, respectively.



    Similar Products

    97
    ATCC normal human gastric mucosal epithelial ges 1 cells
    Normal Human Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Ges 1 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cells/Primary+Small+Airway+Epithelial+Cells%3B+Normal%2C+Human/bio_rxiv__2025__08__24__672019-33-0-20
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    normal human gastric mucosal epithelial ges 1 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Procell Inc human gastric mucosal epithelial cells
    Human Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Cells, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cells/1+ges/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__17__712304-44-0-22
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human gastric mucosal epithelial cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Procell Inc primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium
    Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and <t>epithelial</t> loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.
    Primary Human Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Cell Complete Medium, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cells/bronchial+cells+epithelial+human/pmc12877318-283-8-20
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Procell Inc primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cp h048 cells
    Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and <t>epithelial</t> loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.
    Primary Human Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Cp H048 Cells, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cells/bronchial+cells+epithelial+human/pmc12877318-283-0-20
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cp h048 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Genechem human gastric mucosal epithelial cell line 1
    Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and <t>epithelial</t> loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.
    Human Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Cell Line 1, supplied by Genechem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cells/cell+ductal+epithelial+human+line+pancreatic/pm41535416-212-2-23
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human gastric mucosal epithelial cell line 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Procell Inc human normal gastric mucosal epithelial cells ges 1
    A Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between gastric cancer and adjacent non-tumor tissues. B Venn diagram showing the overlap of GC-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with ferroptosis-related genes (FerrDb) and mitochondrial dysfunction-related genes (MitoProteome). Prognostic gene screening based on overall survival using Univariate Cox regression ( C ), LASSO Cox analysis ( D , E ), Boruta ( F ), and Random Forest ( G ). H Upset plot showing ALDH3A2, PDK4, and GJA1 as common candidate genes identified across all machine learning methods. I Immunohistochemistry images of ALDH3A2, PDK4, and GJA1 proteins from the Human Protein Atlas. J Relative mRNA expression of ALDH3A2 in <t>GES-1,</t> SGC7901, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45 cells assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 4). K Protein expression of ALDH3A2 in GES-1, SGC7901, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45 cells were assessed by immunoblotting (n = 4). L Relative mRNA expression of PDK4 and GJA1 in GES-1, HGC27, and MGC803 cells assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired Student’s t-test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; n.s., not significant.
    Human Normal Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Cells Ges 1, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cells/1+ges/pmc12830774-70-0-30
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human normal gastric mucosal epithelial cells ges 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC human gastric mucosal epithelial cells
    A Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between gastric cancer and adjacent non-tumor tissues. B Venn diagram showing the overlap of GC-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with ferroptosis-related genes (FerrDb) and mitochondrial dysfunction-related genes (MitoProteome). Prognostic gene screening based on overall survival using Univariate Cox regression ( C ), LASSO Cox analysis ( D , E ), Boruta ( F ), and Random Forest ( G ). H Upset plot showing ALDH3A2, PDK4, and GJA1 as common candidate genes identified across all machine learning methods. I Immunohistochemistry images of ALDH3A2, PDK4, and GJA1 proteins from the Human Protein Atlas. J Relative mRNA expression of ALDH3A2 in <t>GES-1,</t> SGC7901, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45 cells assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 4). K Protein expression of ALDH3A2 in GES-1, SGC7901, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45 cells were assessed by immunoblotting (n = 4). L Relative mRNA expression of PDK4 and GJA1 in GES-1, HGC27, and MGC803 cells assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired Student’s t-test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; n.s., not significant.
    Human Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cells/Primary+Small+Airway+Epithelial+Cells%3B+Asthma/pmc12432751-46-0-33
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human gastric mucosal epithelial cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    China Center for Type Culture Collection human normal gastric mucosal epithelial cell line gse-1
    A Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between gastric cancer and adjacent non-tumor tissues. B Venn diagram showing the overlap of GC-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with ferroptosis-related genes (FerrDb) and mitochondrial dysfunction-related genes (MitoProteome). Prognostic gene screening based on overall survival using Univariate Cox regression ( C ), LASSO Cox analysis ( D , E ), Boruta ( F ), and Random Forest ( G ). H Upset plot showing ALDH3A2, PDK4, and GJA1 as common candidate genes identified across all machine learning methods. I Immunohistochemistry images of ALDH3A2, PDK4, and GJA1 proteins from the Human Protein Atlas. J Relative mRNA expression of ALDH3A2 in <t>GES-1,</t> SGC7901, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45 cells assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 4). K Protein expression of ALDH3A2 in GES-1, SGC7901, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45 cells were assessed by immunoblotting (n = 4). L Relative mRNA expression of PDK4 and GJA1 in GES-1, HGC27, and MGC803 cells assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired Student’s t-test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; n.s., not significant.
    Human Normal Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Cell Line Gse 1, supplied by China Center for Type Culture Collection, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cells/ags+cell+line/pm40325317-48-8-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human normal gastric mucosal epithelial cell line gse-1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol‐Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch–Tff2 Pathway

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70628

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.

    Article Snippet: Primary human gastric mucosal epithelial (CP‐H048) cells and primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium (CM‐H048) were purchased from Procell (Wuhan, Hubei, China).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Targeted Gene Expression, Control, Immunofluorescence, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Standard Deviation

    Tff2 knockdown abolishes nitrate protection against ethanol‐induced gastric ulcers in vivo. (A) Establishment of Tff2‐KD rat by tail vein injection of recombinant AAV. (B) The timeline of dietary nitrate administration (3 weeks after injection and 7 days before ethanol gavage). (C and D) The macroscopic appearance and ulcer index of the gastric mucosa in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups with ethanol gavage. The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E and F) Representative histology images of stomach tissue and a histopathologic score of HE staining in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The HE score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G and H) Representative gastric tissue images of AB–PAS staining and mucin histochemical analysis of Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The mucin area was expressed as fold change relative to the scramble + EtOH group. Scale bar = 50 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. AAV, adeno‐associated virus; HE, hematoxylin–eosin; AB–PAS, Alcian blue and periodic acid‐Schiff; EtOH, ethanol; KD, knockdown; Nit, nitrate; Tff2; trefoil factor 2.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol‐Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch–Tff2 Pathway

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70628

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Tff2 knockdown abolishes nitrate protection against ethanol‐induced gastric ulcers in vivo. (A) Establishment of Tff2‐KD rat by tail vein injection of recombinant AAV. (B) The timeline of dietary nitrate administration (3 weeks after injection and 7 days before ethanol gavage). (C and D) The macroscopic appearance and ulcer index of the gastric mucosa in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups with ethanol gavage. The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E and F) Representative histology images of stomach tissue and a histopathologic score of HE staining in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The HE score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G and H) Representative gastric tissue images of AB–PAS staining and mucin histochemical analysis of Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The mucin area was expressed as fold change relative to the scramble + EtOH group. Scale bar = 50 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. AAV, adeno‐associated virus; HE, hematoxylin–eosin; AB–PAS, Alcian blue and periodic acid‐Schiff; EtOH, ethanol; KD, knockdown; Nit, nitrate; Tff2; trefoil factor 2.

    Article Snippet: Primary human gastric mucosal epithelial (CP‐H048) cells and primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium (CM‐H048) were purchased from Procell (Wuhan, Hubei, China).

    Techniques: Knockdown, In Vivo, Injection, Recombinant, Staining, Virus

    Nitrate promotes migration by TFF2 upregulation in vitro. (A) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells in Ibidi culture inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (B and C) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h in (A). (D and E) Representative immunoblotting band of the TFF2 protein and analysis of band gray values. (F) IF staining of pMLC (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 40 µm. (G) IF analysis of pMLC with MFI. (H) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (I and J) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. (K) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts containing ethanol. Scale bar = 500 µm. (L and M) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. Migration rate is quantified by the percentage of closed area to the initial scratch area. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and ns denotes no significance. TFF2, trefoil factor 2; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; EtOH, ethanol; Nit, nitrate; Ctrl, control; MLC, myosin light chain 2; pMLC, phosphorylated myosin light chain 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; NC, negative control; SD, standard deviation.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol‐Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch–Tff2 Pathway

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70628

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Nitrate promotes migration by TFF2 upregulation in vitro. (A) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells in Ibidi culture inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (B and C) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h in (A). (D and E) Representative immunoblotting band of the TFF2 protein and analysis of band gray values. (F) IF staining of pMLC (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 40 µm. (G) IF analysis of pMLC with MFI. (H) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (I and J) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. (K) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts containing ethanol. Scale bar = 500 µm. (L and M) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. Migration rate is quantified by the percentage of closed area to the initial scratch area. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and ns denotes no significance. TFF2, trefoil factor 2; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; EtOH, ethanol; Nit, nitrate; Ctrl, control; MLC, myosin light chain 2; pMLC, phosphorylated myosin light chain 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; NC, negative control; SD, standard deviation.

    Article Snippet: Primary human gastric mucosal epithelial (CP‐H048) cells and primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium (CM‐H048) were purchased from Procell (Wuhan, Hubei, China).

    Techniques: Migration, In Vitro, Western Blot, Staining, Transfection, Negative Control, Control, Standard Deviation

    Nitrate functions by Notch pathway inhibition positively transcripting TFF2 in vitro. (A) Diagram of the wild‐type and mutant sequences for the three predicted RBPJ binding sites within the 251 bp TFF2 promoter probes. (B) Representative electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) autoradiograph. Hot probe is the biotin‐labeled wild‐type oligonucleotides of the truncated TFF2 promoter containing the binding motif; Mutant probe is the labeled oligonucleotides sequence with nucleotides mutated. The cold probe is nonlabeled competitive wild‐type probes (100 and 50 that of the concentrations). The shifted bands are indicated by arrows, which suggested the formation of DNA–protein complexes (lane 2, 3, 7). The super shifted bands indicated the formation of DNA–protein–antibody complexes (lane 3, 7). “+” and “−” represent presence and absence, respectively. (C) Relative TFF2 promoter (Full, Mut1, Mut2, and Mut3) luciferase activity was detected by DLR assays in RBPJ overexpressed and normal‐expressed GES‐1 cells. (D) A schematic diagram showing the location of RBPJ putative binding regions on the TFF2 promoter. (E) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 binding site expression of GES‐1 cells. Target site expression in RBPJ‐treated groups was normalized to IgG negative control groups and expressed as fold change relative to the IgG groups. (F) IF staining of NICD (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G) IF analysis of MFI of nuclear NICD in positive cells. (H) Representative immunoblotting band of Notch signaling pathway in GES‐1 cells. (I–K) Analyses of immunoblotting band gray value of (H). (L) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression of DMSO/DAPT treated GES‐1 cells. Target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the DMSO vehicle group. (M) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD deprived GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector + DMSO group. (N) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD‐RBPJ overexpressed GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector1 + vector2 group. (O) Representative image of PLA of NICD–RBPJ proximity. Each red dot represents a positive signal of NICD–RBPJ interaction and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. Nit, nitrate; EtOH, ethanol; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; NICD, intracellular structural domain; RBPJ, recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; TFF2, trefoil factor 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; Yhhu‐3792, N2‐(4‐isopropylphenyl)‐5‐(3‐methoxyphenoxy) quinazoline‐2,4‐diamine; Luc, luciferase; SD, standard deviation; DLR, dual‐luciferase report; PLA, proximity ligation assay.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol‐Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch–Tff2 Pathway

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70628

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Nitrate functions by Notch pathway inhibition positively transcripting TFF2 in vitro. (A) Diagram of the wild‐type and mutant sequences for the three predicted RBPJ binding sites within the 251 bp TFF2 promoter probes. (B) Representative electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) autoradiograph. Hot probe is the biotin‐labeled wild‐type oligonucleotides of the truncated TFF2 promoter containing the binding motif; Mutant probe is the labeled oligonucleotides sequence with nucleotides mutated. The cold probe is nonlabeled competitive wild‐type probes (100 and 50 that of the concentrations). The shifted bands are indicated by arrows, which suggested the formation of DNA–protein complexes (lane 2, 3, 7). The super shifted bands indicated the formation of DNA–protein–antibody complexes (lane 3, 7). “+” and “−” represent presence and absence, respectively. (C) Relative TFF2 promoter (Full, Mut1, Mut2, and Mut3) luciferase activity was detected by DLR assays in RBPJ overexpressed and normal‐expressed GES‐1 cells. (D) A schematic diagram showing the location of RBPJ putative binding regions on the TFF2 promoter. (E) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 binding site expression of GES‐1 cells. Target site expression in RBPJ‐treated groups was normalized to IgG negative control groups and expressed as fold change relative to the IgG groups. (F) IF staining of NICD (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G) IF analysis of MFI of nuclear NICD in positive cells. (H) Representative immunoblotting band of Notch signaling pathway in GES‐1 cells. (I–K) Analyses of immunoblotting band gray value of (H). (L) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression of DMSO/DAPT treated GES‐1 cells. Target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the DMSO vehicle group. (M) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD deprived GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector + DMSO group. (N) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD‐RBPJ overexpressed GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector1 + vector2 group. (O) Representative image of PLA of NICD–RBPJ proximity. Each red dot represents a positive signal of NICD–RBPJ interaction and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. Nit, nitrate; EtOH, ethanol; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; NICD, intracellular structural domain; RBPJ, recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; TFF2, trefoil factor 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; Yhhu‐3792, N2‐(4‐isopropylphenyl)‐5‐(3‐methoxyphenoxy) quinazoline‐2,4‐diamine; Luc, luciferase; SD, standard deviation; DLR, dual‐luciferase report; PLA, proximity ligation assay.

    Article Snippet: Primary human gastric mucosal epithelial (CP‐H048) cells and primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium (CM‐H048) were purchased from Procell (Wuhan, Hubei, China).

    Techniques: Inhibition, In Vitro, Mutagenesis, Binding Assay, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Autoradiography, Labeling, Sequencing, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Negative Control, Staining, Western Blot, Targeted Gene Expression, Plasmid Preparation, Standard Deviation, Proximity Ligation Assay

    A Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between gastric cancer and adjacent non-tumor tissues. B Venn diagram showing the overlap of GC-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with ferroptosis-related genes (FerrDb) and mitochondrial dysfunction-related genes (MitoProteome). Prognostic gene screening based on overall survival using Univariate Cox regression ( C ), LASSO Cox analysis ( D , E ), Boruta ( F ), and Random Forest ( G ). H Upset plot showing ALDH3A2, PDK4, and GJA1 as common candidate genes identified across all machine learning methods. I Immunohistochemistry images of ALDH3A2, PDK4, and GJA1 proteins from the Human Protein Atlas. J Relative mRNA expression of ALDH3A2 in GES-1, SGC7901, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45 cells assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 4). K Protein expression of ALDH3A2 in GES-1, SGC7901, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45 cells were assessed by immunoblotting (n = 4). L Relative mRNA expression of PDK4 and GJA1 in GES-1, HGC27, and MGC803 cells assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired Student’s t-test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; n.s., not significant.

    Journal: Cell Death & Disease

    Article Title: ALDH3A2 negatively orchestrates gastric cancer progression through a synergistic induction of ferroptosis and ferroptosis-driven macrophage reprogramming

    doi: 10.1038/s41419-025-08364-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between gastric cancer and adjacent non-tumor tissues. B Venn diagram showing the overlap of GC-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with ferroptosis-related genes (FerrDb) and mitochondrial dysfunction-related genes (MitoProteome). Prognostic gene screening based on overall survival using Univariate Cox regression ( C ), LASSO Cox analysis ( D , E ), Boruta ( F ), and Random Forest ( G ). H Upset plot showing ALDH3A2, PDK4, and GJA1 as common candidate genes identified across all machine learning methods. I Immunohistochemistry images of ALDH3A2, PDK4, and GJA1 proteins from the Human Protein Atlas. J Relative mRNA expression of ALDH3A2 in GES-1, SGC7901, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45 cells assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 4). K Protein expression of ALDH3A2 in GES-1, SGC7901, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45 cells were assessed by immunoblotting (n = 4). L Relative mRNA expression of PDK4 and GJA1 in GES-1, HGC27, and MGC803 cells assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired Student’s t-test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; n.s., not significant.

    Article Snippet: Human normal gastric mucosal epithelial cells GES-1, gastric cancer cell lines MGC803, HGC27, SGC7901, MKN45, and human embryonic kidney cells (293 T) used in this study were all sourced from Procell (Wuhan, China).

    Techniques: Immunohistochemistry, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot